1 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:13:53pm |
Sheriff Joe Arpaio trips, breaks arm
Sheriff Joe Arpaio fell on his way to lunch Thursday in downtown Phoenix and suffered a broken arm, officials said.
The 80-year-old Maricopa County sheriff was in the emergency room of a hospital about 1:45 p.m. and awaiting a physician following X-rays that showed a fracture. He is said to be in good spirits.
Obviously this was an attempt by the Obama regime to silence Arpaio.
/
2 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:14:51pm |
“If some external body is turning the commission off based on their own views of what things ought to be, with no reasonable explanation, then we are going to have a little meeting about who turns that light on or off.”
— Col. James Pohl
3 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:14:51pm |
re: #1 Kragar (Antichrist )
Sheriff Joe Arpaio trips, breaks arm
Obviously this was an attempt by the Obama regime to silence Arpaio.
/
Did he trip over his own ego?
4 | lawhawk Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:15:08pm |
Okay, this was clever: “who put habeas corpus on a dimmer switch”.
5 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:15:14pm |
re: #1 Kragar (Antichrist )
Sheriff Joe Arpaio trips, breaks arm
Obviously this was an attempt by the Obama regime to silence Arpaio.
/
Now is the winter of our broken bones.
6 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:15:34pm |
It’s 4:15 here on the East Coast. How has Gene Sperling threatened you today?
/
7 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:16:07pm |
In any case. OK, been turning a blind eye to GITMO for a long time now. Not that I will make it a major cause of mine. But, Houston, we’ve got a problem. This is bullshit.
8 | lawhawk Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:16:22pm |
re: #6 Bulworth
It’s 10pm. Do you know where your daily media threat is?
9 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:16:25pm |
re: #1 Kragar (Antichrist )
Sheriff Joe Arpaio trips, breaks arm
Obviously this was an attempt by the Obama regime to silence Arpaio.
/
Gene Sperling missed Woodward. Collateral damage.
//
10 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:22:29pm |
’ @pontifex deleted all his tweets— mia farrow (@MiaFarrow) February 28, 2013
11 | Interesting Times Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:23:51pm |
In the “bear shits in the woods” department, yet more evidence the National Review is such a collection of primitive, mouth-breathing, backwards sexists that even its female writers are into misogyny:
Military-Sexual-Trauma Syndrome
Feminists claim (speciously) that a whopping one-quarter of college co-eds are sexually assaulted by their fellow students in college; I am not aware of comparable claims that huge numbers of female college graduates are as a result ending up on the street. (The difference between the outcomes for college graduates and vets does not lie in the relative availability of services: College rape crisis centers and hotlines are barely used.) I am not even aware of claims that victims of stranger rape are more likely to end up dealing drugs and homeless, but that evidence may in fact be out there. (I recently wrote about a tough-as-nails, pro-police building superintendent in the Bronx who was raped three times, including by her mother’s boyfriend as a child; she is only one case, obviously, but she was not on disability benefits or on the streets.)
But let’s say that for these homeless female vets, it really was their sexual experiences in the military that caused their downward spiral into, as the Times puts it, “alcohol and substance abuse, depression and domestic violence.” Why then have those same feminists who are now lamenting the life-destroying effects of “MST” insisted on putting women into combat units?
(I linked to a WebCite cache because I don’t want to give the stupid shit the satisfaction of more hits)
12 | makeitstop Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:28:00pm |
13 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:28:44pm |
re: #11 Interesting Times
Obviously the correct response to reports of rape in the military services is to exclude women from the military rather than prosecuting the rapists. This has been your daily wingnut ethics minute. /
14 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:29:05pm |
re: #10 Gus
He’s an ex-pope. Fallible again.
15 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:29:20pm |
House Republican: We’ll Need Dems To Pass Some Bills
House Republicans must be willing to enlist Democrats to pass important legislation, a moderate GOP lawmaker told TPM on Thursday after his leadership passed the Violence Against Women Act with mostly Democratic votes.
“I suspect you may see more issues appear like this,” moderate Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) told TPM in an interview Thursday afternoon. “It’s quite possible on matters of governance, where there are not the Republican votes, that there will be bipartisan coalitions formed to pass important legislation. … If John Boehner doesn’t have enough Republican votes, we’ll need Democratic votes. It’s very basic. There’s no way around it.”
Either you can switch parties and join the same members of Congress or you can fuck right off. There is nothing the GOP has to offer.
16 | Sionainn Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:29:45pm |
Las Vegas Strip Shooting Suspect Arrested
Thank goodness.
17 | HoosierHoops Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:29:56pm |
Friday marks the Popes first day of retirement. He will spend his days in solitude and prayer.
I didn’t know the Pope was such a huge Lakers Fan.
18 | erik_t Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:31:23pm |
re: #12 makeitstop
What means this?
It’s easy to interpret as a rejection by the Vatican of Benedict’s desire for a social media strategy.
19 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:31:26pm |
re: #15 Kragar (Antichrist )
House Republican: We’ll Need Dems To Pass Some Bills
Either you can switch parties and join the same members of Congress or you can fuck right off. There is nothing the GOP has to offer.
Well, they do have something to offer: Votes on Dem bills. That’d be a return to normal.
20 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:31:28pm |
Fischer: Liberals Are Modern Day Pharisees
Without even a hint of irony, Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association on Focal Point claimed that the Pharisees whom Jesus used as an example of self-righteous, judgmental, power-seeking, sanctimonious and empty religiosity are still around today… and are liberals.
“If you look for the group of people today who are doing what the Pharisees did in the Jesus did, you have to look at secular fundamentalists, you have to look at liberals, you have to look at progressives,” Fischer said.
Valid examples, what are those? lol
/
21 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:32:17pm |
So the House GOP holds up VAWA passage for over a year (because of LGBT, tribal & immigrant protections), and when it finally passes, they mostly vote against:
[Link: clerk.house.gov…]
REPUBLICAN
Y:87 N:138DEMOCRATIC
Y:199 N:0
And LCR covers it like this:
LCR Celebrates Republican-Controlled House of Representatives Passage of LGBT-Inclusive Violence Against Women Act: logcabin.org/site/apps/nlne…— LogCabinRepublicans (@LogCabinGOP) February 28, 2013
Heh.
22 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:32:22pm |
re: #11 Interesting Times
In the “bear shits in the woods” department, yet more evidence the National Review is such a collection of primitive, mouth-breathing, backwards radicals that even its female writers are misogynists:
Military-Sexual-Trauma Syndrome
(I linked to a WebCite cache because I don’t want to give the stupid shit the satisfaction of more hits)
From the article:
Isn’t there a contradiction in expecting the military to “protect” you while it also sends you out to face mortal risk?
I don’t have words. I just don’t.
How dare women expect to be “protected” from rape. Whatever the fuck that means.
I don’t even. I just. How do you put together a world view where something like that makes sense and is ok to say? I don’t understand.
23 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:32:42pm |
re: #12 makeitstop
What means this?
He got drunk last night and Tweeted a bunch of stuff that he regretted in the morning.
//
24 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:32:45pm |
As long as you have an R next your name, don’t try conning me by saying you’re a moderate. The GOP gave up on being moderate years ago.
25 | erik_t Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:33:11pm |
re: #22 klys
From the article:
Isn’t there a contradiction in expecting the military to “protect” you while it also sends you out to face mortal risk?
Breaking: all US Army tanks to be stripped of armor.
26 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:33:32pm |
re: #21 simoom
So the House GOP holds up VAWA passage for over a year (because of LGBT, tribal & immigrant protections), and when it finally passes, they mostly vote against:
[Link: clerk.house.gov…]
And LCR covers it like this:
Heh.
Some people like abusive relationships.
/
27 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:34:09pm |
re: #11 Interesting Times
Thanks for wading in. Saw some rumbling about it on Twitter… Started reading it and bailed.
28 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:34:50pm |
re: #22 klys
From the article:
I don’t have words. I just don’t.
How dare women expect to be “protected” from rape. Whatever the fuck that means.
I don’t even. I just. How do you put together a world view where something like that makes sense and is ok to say? I don’t understand.
Usually, you would only expect to be attacked by the enemy, not your fellow soldiers.
I guess that is too much to expect according to some people.
29 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:34:52pm |
“If you look for the group of people today who are doing what the Pharisees did in the Jesus did, you have to look at secular fundamentalists, you have to look at liberals, you have to look at progressives,” Fischer said.
I remember well when the secular humanists fundamentalists dragged the woman caught in adultery before Jesus and demanded that a religious penalty—stoning—be given her. //
30 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:34:59pm |
re: #25 erik_t
Breaking: all US Army tanks to be stripped of armor.
Don’t I recall outrage because troops were in some cases providing their own bulletproof gear during the Iraq War?
31 | makeitstop Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:36:13pm |
re: #18 erik_t
It’s easy to interpret as a rejection by the Vatican of Benedict’s desire for a social media strategy.
Ohhhhh. Pontiff Ex….. Now I git it.
32 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:36:41pm |
The wingnuts are angry at this.
.@chucktodd on Woodward: “I get emails like this almost every hour, whether it’s from the White House or the Hill” politi.co/XFL21w— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) February 28, 2013
Just think. Tonight Woodward goes on Hannity and the madness will erupt again. In all likelihood, Woodward will hit a Sunday political show this weekend.
33 | A Mom Anon Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:36:45pm |
re: #22 klys
That would be rape by their fellow soldiers and sometimes military contractors. Seriously, the ONLY people responsible for rape are RAPISTS. No RAPISTS, no rape, amazing how that works.
I seriously hate people sometimes.
34 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:37:09pm |
And LCR covers it like this:
LCR Celebrates Republican-Controlled House of Representatives Passage of LGBT-Inclusive Violence Against Women Act:
logcabin.org/site/apps/nlne…
— LogCabinRepublicans (@LogCabinGOP)
February 28, 2013
Wait, did they actually look at the roll call? Oh, they’re just being hacks. Never mind.
35 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:37:55pm |
re: #32 Gus
The wingnuts are angry at this.
.@chucktodd on Woodward: “I get emails like this almost every hour, whether it’s from the White House or the Hill” politi.co/XFL21w
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) February 28, 2013Just think. Tonight Woodward goes on Hannity and the madness will erupt again. In all likelihood, Woodward will hit a Sunday political show this weekend.
OUTRAGE!
36 | efuseakay Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:38:08pm |
re: #1 Kragar (Antichrist )
Sheriff Joe Arpaio trips, breaks arm
Obviously this was an attempt by the Obama regime to silence Arpaio.
/
He doesn’t even know how to walk. Sure, let’s trust him and his “posse” with the safety of our children!
37 | Dr. Matt Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:38:14pm |
re: #30 klys
Don’t I recall outrage because troops were in some cases providing their own bulletproof gear during the Iraq War?
Yes, but that’s ok when there is a White President.
38 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:38:18pm |
re: #24 Kragar (Antichrist )
As long as you have an R next your name, don’t try conning me by saying you’re a moderate. The GOP gave up on being moderate years ago.
Dent is from the Allentown area and has Toomey’s old seat. Has successfully defended it multiple times since then.
[Link: en.wikipedia.org…]
Not as full-bore wingnut as some, but also went on record defending the Ryan Plan.
39 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:38:29pm |
re: #24 Kragar (Antichrist )
As long as you have an R next your name, don’t try conning me by saying you’re a moderate. The GOP gave up on being moderate years ago.
I mean shit, you don’t have to become a Dem. At least become an independent. Really, the excuses I hear for staying registered with that party are slily. Even Lincoln Chaffee who I liked and respected as a Senator had a really pathetic one. It’s nice that your father named you after Abraham Lincoln but the GOP stopped believing in Lincoln’s legacy years ago when Nixon and co decided it was better to court angry segregationists rather than minorities to your party. And to Mr. Chafee’s credit, he has since switched.
40 | Interesting Times Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:38:35pm |
re: #27 Gus
Thanks for wading in. Saw some rumbling about it on Tweeter… Started reading it and bailed.
I’m hard-pressed to offer more commentary on its blithering, sadistic stupidity without risking a violation of LGF site policy.
42 | makeitstop Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:39:12pm |
re: #23 Gus
He got drunk last night and Tweeted a bunch of stuff that he regretted in the morning.
//
How do you say ‘Bqhatevwr’ in Latin?
43 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:39:22pm |
I remember well when the secularist humanists seculars arrested Jesus and demanded He be crucified for the sin of blasphemy. /
44 | efuseakay Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:40:00pm |
re: #21 simoom
So the House GOP holds up VAWA passage for over a year (because of LGBT, tribal & immigrant protections), and when it finally passes, they mostly vote against:
[Link: clerk.house.gov…]
And LCR covers it like this:
Heh.
@logcabingop Did you even bother looking at the roll call? If you feel this is something to celebrate, I feel sorry for you.— efuseakay (@efuseakay) February 28, 2013
45 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:40:27pm |
re: #40 Interesting Times
I’m hard-pressed to offer more commentary on its blithering, sadistic stupidity without risking a violation of LGF site policy.
I can’t even string together 5 words on it. Violation of policy or not.
46 | Dr. Matt Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:41:21pm |
If secularist humanists actually existed during the time of Jesus they would have been executed for blasphemy.
47 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:42:12pm |
re: #46 Dr. Matt
If secularist humanists actually existed during the time of Jesus they would have been executed for blasphemy.
Ours is a loving and caring God.
I don’t believe in God.
KILL HIM!
48 | Bulworth Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:42:35pm |
I remember well when the atheist secularist fundamentalists arrested a man Jesus healed on the Sabbath Day for violating the secular sacredness of the day set aside for secular atheism. /
49 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:42:37pm |
re: #46 Dr. Matt
If secularist humanists actually existed during the time of Jesus they would have been executed for blasphemy.
Probably did exist - but were careful enough to not openly proclaim it.
50 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:43:22pm |
re: #47 Gus
Ours is a loving and caring God.
I don’t believe in God.
KILL HIM!
Shit, they think you’re a heathen if you dare to say “I don’t know if there is a God or not but I want to try to live my life the best way I can.” That’s being a heathen in a fundamentalist’s mindset.
51 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:43:27pm |
re: #32 Gus
Politico gets to first help hype the controversy, then help debunk it.
52 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:44:25pm |
re: #47 Gus
Ours is a loving and caring God.
I don’t believe in God.
KILL HIM!
If you really read the Bible, the only sane conclusion one can reach is that God is the bad guy in the story.
53 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:44:25pm |
re: #51 Charles Johnson
Politico gets to first help hype the controversy, then help debunk it.
Yeah, seems like they’re playing both angles. Hype it. Debunk it. Repeat.
54 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:46:30pm |
re: #44 efuseakay
Of course not, these are the people who get mad at Obama for taking too long to come out in favor of gay marriage which is fair game but then they praise Dick Cheney who belonged to an administration that actively pushed a ban on gay marriage. I mean kudos to Cheney for not being a bigot but he did nothing to stop his administration’s push on that issue and yes I know he was the VP but kind of funny how he exerted his influence in other things but not that one huh They don’t have to like Obama and the D’s but the LCR’s act is to suggest that somehow the Republicans are the better party on gay rights which is funny as shit considering Boehner’s insanity when it comes to defending DOMA at all costs.
55 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:46:38pm |
re: #52 Kragar (Antichrist )
If you really read the Bible, the only sane conclusion one can reach is that God is the bad guy in the story.
Yeah. “Hmm, think I’ll start over again. Let’s see. I have an idea. I’ll flood the Earth and drown millions of people and animals except for this weird family who I’ll have build a giant boat and put two of each animal in the world…”
56 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:46:46pm |
re: #22 klys
Because I seriously can’t let this go.
“Protection” from rape seems to consist of the rules saying “it’s bad, don’t do this” and expecting the military to prosecute someone who does. Just like civilians expect the police/prosecutor to do.
Meanwhile, the list of things that women are supposed to do to prevent rape is long. Keep your keys in your hand when walking alone at night. Don’t talk on the phone. Always watch your drink at a party, never leave it unattended. Don’t accept a drink except from the bartender’s hand. Be aware of your surroundings. Watch how you dress. How you interact. Don’t send mixed signals.
And all of this is well and good - we should be aware of our surroundings and behavior because nobody wants to be a statistic - but where’s the list of shit that guys are supposed to do to reduce rape? Why can’t the discussion be about how to reduce rape and not how a woman (or man) becomes a statistic?
Fucking hell, there are days I hate people.
57 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:49:09pm |
So Fox New’s lead story is “Woodward-gate”. Take a look it how they abridge the Sperling e-mail for their readership’s consumption:
[Link: www.foxnews.com…]
Then, he said he received a page-long email from the aide — apparently Sperling — that said: “I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. … You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”
Here’s what they edited out:
[Link: www.politico.com…]
Bob:I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today.
My bad. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall — but feel on the other hand that[Y]ou[‘re] focus[ing] on a few specific trees that gives a very wrongperception[impression] of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here.
But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend,I think you will regret staking out that claim.The idea that the sequester was to force both sides to go back to try at a big or grand barain with a mix of entitlements and revenues (even if there were serious disagreements on composition) was part of the DNA of the thing from the start. It was an accepted part of the understanding — from the start. Really. It was assumed by the Rs on the Supercommittee that came right after: it was assumed in the November-December 2012 negotiations. There may have been big disagreements over rates and ratios — but that it was supposed to be replaced by entitlements and revenues of some form is not controversial. (Indeed, the discretionary savings amount from the Boehner-Obama negotiations were locked in in BCA: the sequester was just designed to force all back to table on entitlements and revenues.)
I agree there are more than one side to our first disagreement, but again think this latter issue is diffferent. Not out to argue and argue on this latter point. Just my sincere advice. Your call obviously.
My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize.
Fox could teach a master class in whatever-TF this is.
58 | Dr. Matt Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:49:27pm |
re: #47 Gus
Ours is a loving and caring God.
I don’t believe in God.
KILL HIM!
59 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:49:51pm |
re: #56 klys
And in the end, since most women are attacked by people who are their intimates, the real advice would be “Don’t be intimate with men.”
Nothing women do increases the chance of rape. There is plenty of rape in societies like Saudi Arabia where women’s rights are circumscribed— because they are.
60 | erik_t Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:50:04pm |
re: #52 Kragar (Antichrist )
If you really read the Bible, the only sane conclusion one can reach is that God is the bad guy in the story.
Well, the first half. Just gotta remember not to trifle with Vengeful Old-Testament God.
Friendly Hippy New-Testament God seems like an alright guy.
61 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:50:18pm |
62 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:50:32pm |
re: #57 simoom
So Fox New’s lead story is “Woodward-gate”. Take a look it how they abridge the Sperling e-mail for their readership’s consumption:
[Link: www.foxnews.com…]
Here’s what they edited out:
[Link: www.politico.com…]
Fox could teach a master class in whatever-TF this is.
Fox News: We distort and call the President a traitor, and then you decide. Fair and Balanced enough to make the greatest propagandists proud.
63 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:50:36pm |
re: #60 erik_t
Well, the first half. Just gotta remember not to trifle with Vengeful Old-Testament God.
Friendly Hippy New-Testament God seems like an alright guy.
Yeah. People change. //
64 | Shvaughn Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:51:07pm |
re: #12 makeitstop
What means this?
Means this:
The process of transition to that new pope now begins. Meanwhile, the Catholic Church is without a leader.
Symbolizing that gulf at the top, all Benedict’s tweets as @Pontifex have been archived. Instead, the account’s Twitter page reads only “Sede Vacante,” or empty seat.
65 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:51:40pm |
re: #60 erik_t
Well, the first half. Just gotta remember not to trifle with Vengeful Old-Testament God.
Friendly Hippy New-Testament God seems like an alright guy.
Including his plan to get his son crucified as an example?
//
66 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:52:16pm |
re: #62 HappyWarrior
I especially like how they just added and altered words here and there, with no indication that they did, within the quoted passages. /
67 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:52:47pm |
re: #60 erik_t
Well, the first half. Just gotta remember not to trifle with Vengeful Old-Testament God.
Friendly Hippy New-Testament God seems like an alright guy.
Yeah, but his fan club is a bunch of dicks.
68 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:53:58pm |
re: #62 HappyWarrior
“I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. … You’re focusing on a few specific trees that give a very wrong impression of the forest. But perhaps we will just not see eye to eye here. … I think you will regret staking out that claim.”
Man, they dot-dot-dotted the hell out of that email.
69 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:54:26pm |
Honestly on the subject of religion, I can remember the idea of Christ being crucified to “die for our sins” bothering me as early as five or six when I took CCD classes. Just didn’t seem right to me. I mean I still believed in God. NOwadays I am frankly not sure and really don’t care because I want to make the best of this life and don’t see how a god or not a god makes a difference. I still do want to believe in an afterlife though.
70 | erik_t Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:54:54pm |
re: #65 Feline Fearless Leader
Including his plan to get his son crucified as an example?
//
No one’s perfect.
/
71 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:55:29pm |
re: #59 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
And in the end, since most women are attacked by people who are their intimates, the real advice would be “Don’t be intimate with men.”
Nothing women do increases the chance of rape. There is plenty of rape in societies like Saudi Arabia where women’s rights are circumscribed— because they are.
But if they just had gunz, they could protect themselves!
///
72 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:55:51pm |
re: #68 Charles Johnson
Man, they dot-dot-dotted the hell out of that email.
Takes skill. But yeah the narrative that Hannity is going to give his viewers tonight is of the big mean WH staffer pushing the poor heroic Woodward around. He’ll also ignore the response letter by Woodward where Woodward says the apology isn’t necessary. I don’t know what Woodward’s deal is.
73 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:56:07pm |
re: #70 erik_t
No one’s perfect.
/
Could just be same policies with a more acceptable “face” put on them.
/
74 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:56:28pm |
re: #70 erik_t
No one’s perfect.
/
I still think that line from Some Like It Hot is one of the best lines ever in comedy.
75 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:57:33pm |
76 | Feline Fearless Leader Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:57:39pm |
re: #72 HappyWarrior
Takes skill. But yeah the narrative that Hannity is going to give his viewers tonight is of the big mean WH staffer pushing the poor heroic Woodward around. He’ll also ignore the response letter by Woodward where Woodward says the apology isn’t necessary. I don’t know what Woodward’s deal is.
My guess is that the key at this point is “any publicity is good publicity”. And Hannity will be able to spin it into being Obama’s fault in any case - assuming they even stay on Woodward’s exchange with the staffer as the main topic.
77 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 1:59:13pm |
Of course, it’s all hype to get you to watch Hannity’s show, I hope everyone realizes that. You won’t learn anything new.
78 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:00:12pm |
re: #76 Feline Fearless Leader
My guess is that the key at this point is “any publicity is good publicity”. And Hannity will be able to spin it into being Obama’s fault in any case - assuming they even stay on Woodward’s exchange with the staffer as the main topic.
Hell Hannity would honestly try to spin it in to the staffer being personally directed by Obama to write the letter. Really, the fact that Woodward is going on Hannity really says a lot about his agenda in this story.
79 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:00:55pm |
re: #77 Charles Johnson
Of course, it’s all hype to get you to watch Hannity’s show, I hope everyone realizes that. You won’t learn anything new.
Well I won’t be doing tonight what I don’t do every night and that’s hear Sean Hannity’s annoying whiny voice and see his smug face.
80 | jamesfirecat Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:00:59pm |
re: #68 Charles Johnson
Man, they dot-dot-dotted the hell out of that email.
So the guys’ll gets in toch with me, yaddda yaddda yaddda I am in fear for my life….
81 | jamesfirecat Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:02:05pm |
re: #69 HappyWarrior
Honestly on the subject of religion, I can remember the idea of Christ being crucified to “die for our sins” bothering me as early as five or six when I took CCD classes. Just didn’t seem right to me. I mean I still believed in God. NOwadays I am frankly not sure and really don’t care because I want to make the best of this life and don’t see how a god or not a god makes a difference. I still do want to believe in an afterlife though.
I feel the same way I really hope there is an afterlife/reincarnation, existing is one of those rare things I am so very good at, I would hate to stop doing it….
82 | erik_t Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:02:13pm |
re: #77 Charles Johnson
Of course, it’s all hype to get you to watch Hannity’s show, I hope everyone realizes that. You won’t learn anything new.
Thus making it exactly how different from Hannity’s show on literally any other night?
83 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:06:14pm |
re: #81 jamesfirecat
I feel the same way I really hope there is an afterlife/reincarnation, existing is one of those rare things I am so very good at, I would hate to stop doing it….
Yeah and I have to admit on a selfish level there’s a desire to meet famous people who have passed on or on a sentimental level relatives not met or those who died when I was young. Never knew my paternal grandfather who all my relatives say was just the most amazing guy, I’m sort of named after him, and my one uncle who died when I was a baby of an OD.
84 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:07:06pm |
re: #82 erik_t
Thus making it exactly how different from Hannity’s show on literally any other night?
Over and under for “Chicago thugs” or some use of the word thug or thuggery by Sean tonight. I’ll go with 13.
85 | efuseakay Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:09:09pm |
re: #46 Dr. Matt
If secularist humanists actually existed during the time of Jesus they would have been executed for blasphemy.
Biggus Dickus was a secularist humanist. That’s why nobody dare speak his name back then, or else they’d be thwoan to da fleur.
86 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:12:31pm |
Email I just received from the NAACP:
I’m trying to keep my cool here,
It no longer surprises me when extremist state legislators try to restrict our voting rights. I don’t like it and we fight against it, but I’m no longer surprised by it.
What surprises and outrages me is that yesterday a Supreme Court Justice said that the protection of the right to vote is a “perpetuation of racial entitlement.”
Read what Justice Scalia had to say about the Voting Rights Act (VRA) — and join me in speaking up for our rights as American citizens.
Let’s think about those words and what they mean: “racial entitlement.”
Those words suggest undeserved privilege. They suggest that our right to vote doesn’t need protection.
We know it does. In Kilmichael, Mississippi, the all-white city council canceled an election when it became clear that black candidates might win. In Shelby County, Alabama, after a black man won elected office local legislators gerrymandered him out of office. Both of these injustices took place in the past ten years and both were remedied quickly because of Section 5 of the VRA.
Moreover, in just the past two years, six of the nine states covered by the Voting Rights Act passed laws making it harder for people of color to vote. Most of those laws were blocked thanks to Section 5, as well.
Get angry and speak up now:
[Link: action.naacp.org…]
Congressman John Lewis was sitting in front of me in the Supreme Court as Justice Scalia spoke those words.
I was so appalled for him at that moment. This hero of the civil rights movement who had fought and won so many battles to protect our community’s right to vote had to listen as Justice Scalia reduced it all — without any sense of irony — to “racial entitlement.”
For Congressman Lewis, for Rosa Parks, and all the other heroes of the civil rights movement, stand with the NAACP to say that voting is a right, not an entitlement:
[Link: action.naacp.org…]
Thanks,
Ben
Benjamin Jealous
President and CEO
NAACP
87 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:13:51pm |
The dumbest dumbass on Twitter didn’t get the memo about the Woodward FAIL
Bring Down Obama Like You Brought Nixon #StandWithWoodward #tcot #ocra #opslam #teaparty #lnyhbt #tgdn twitter.com/ChristiChat/st…— Conservative (@ChristiChat) February 28, 2013
88 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:15:53pm |
Pic of Woodward’s credibility;
Image: h99121-500.jpg
89 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:16:18pm |
re: #77 Charles Johnson
Of course, it’s all hype to get you to watch Hannity’s show, I hope everyone realizes that. You won’t learn anything new.
Besides whatever new excuse he gives for his moment of derp. My money’s still on “I’m the real victim here!”
90 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:17:53pm |
re: #88 Varek Raith
Pic of Woodward’s credibility;
Image: h99121-500.jpg
It’s too bad because I think some people are giving him a pass because “Hey, he broke Watergate so he has absolute credibility.:” which frankly no one should have I must have missed the part of the Constitution where a president should be impeached because of something a staffer did in the heat of the moment. And hell, the email was a fucking apology for crying out loud. An apology. These people want to make everything anyone who works for Obama does out to be a crime. It’s the boy who cries wolf times a 1000.
91 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:18:01pm |
re: #86 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
Email I just received from the NAACP:
…
Congressman John Lewis was sitting in front of me in the Supreme Court as Justice Scalia spoke those words. …
Civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis told me he almost cried when Scalia called Voting Rights Act a ‘perpetuation of racial entitlement’— Ari Berman (@AriBerman) February 28, 2013
92 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:19:13pm |
re: #91 simoom
John Lewis has put up with too much shit.
93 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:19:27pm |
Bryan is turning me into a Christian because every time I read one of his Tweets I say JESUS CHRIST!
Liberal media cutting Woodward off at the ankles. Same people who can’t get over how judgmental Christians are.— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 28, 2013
94 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:19:52pm |
re: #91 simoom
Considering that Lewis risked his life for Civil Rights, I don’t blame him and I wouldn’t have blamed either if he had used salty language to describe Justice Scalia’s pathetic bullshit.
95 | Stanley Sea Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:20:05pm |
re: #86 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
Got it too. Thanks for posting.
Excellent email. Puts what Scalia said in perspective. A very scary perspective.
96 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:22:05pm |
re: #92 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
John Lewis has put up with too much shit.
He really has. I bet he was also upset when Elena Kagan’s admiration and work for Justice Marshall was made out to be a negative by the Senate Republicans too during her confirmation hearings.
97 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:28:09pm |
Le Monde is now confirming that AQIM commander Abou Zeid was killed in northern Mali: mobile.lemonde.fr/afrique/articl… huge news.— Andrew Lebovich (@tweetsintheME) February 28, 2013
Still no word about 4 hostages Abou Zeid held for more than 2 years. 43 members of his Katiba killed along with him: mobile.lemonde.fr/afrique/articl…— Andrew Lebovich (@tweetsintheME) February 28, 2013
98 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:28:36pm |
We’ve gone from the vast majority of Republicans and Democrats voting for the VRA and subsequent decades confirmation of its constitutionality to John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, saying it’s not constitutional. This is real judicial activism. A true judicial conservative like many of the judges on the Warren and later Burger court would understand precedence and the fact that the law has worked as intended. And yes, I’m angry, angry that Chief Justice Roberts would try to twist this in to oh woe the poor South is being discriminated against and Scalia’s claim that it’s just a pretty worded law and that crap about racial entitlements. These are both men that Republican presidential candidates want their model justices to be. There’s a lot of reasons to oppose the Republican party but considering judicial appointments are for life or last years after that executive leaves, Republican judiciary picks are a very simple and obvious reason to oppose that party.
99 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:29:05pm |
FRC’s Tony Perkins: Democrats Aligned with ‘Jewish Lobby,’ ‘Enjoy the Money’ Coming from Jews | Right Wing Watch rightwingwatch.org/content/frc-s-…— Gus (@Gus_802) February 28, 2013
100 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:29:59pm |
In 1964, Lewis coordinated SNCC’s efforts for “Mississippi Freedom Summer,” a campaign to register black voters across the South. The following year, Lewis led one of the most dramatic protests of the era. On March 7, 1965 — a day that would become known as “Bloody Sunday” — Lewis and fellow activist Hosea Williams led over 600 marchers across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. At the end of the bridge, they were met by Alabama State Troopers, who ordered them to disperse. When the marchers stopped to pray, the police discharged tear gas and mounted troopers charged the demonstrators, beating them with night sticks. Lewis’s skull was fractured, but he escaped across the bridge, to a church in Selma. Before he could be taken to the hospital, John Lewis appeared before the television cameras calling on President Johnson to intervene in Alabama.
It is not quite fifty years since Congressman Lewis was beaten down for having the temerity to insist that he was the equal of a white man. Are we really to pretend that all that poisonous racism has disappeared? When nailbombs that could kill hundred get planted in the northeast, while voter suppression affecting minorities outrageously is endorsed at the highest levels of the GOP? Really?
Can it be that the Supreme Court justices are ignorant of the cases that were raised under section 5? If so, how can they be questioning its relevance, whatever the arguments as to constitutionality?
101 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:30:16pm |
But here’s the irony. Is that the Democratic Party and the Democratic senators that supported Hagel, in spite of the fact that he has a record that’s deplorable on Israel, it comes from Democratic senators who are mostly aligned with a lot of the Jewish lobby here in Washington and around the nation, enjoy the money coming from the Jewish community. The Jewish community tends to be liberal, not all, but a lot of it is, and it supports Democratic candidates. But yet the Democratic Party works against the benefit of Israel in many ways, and this is an example of it.
— Tony Perkins
102 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:31:18pm |
re: #97 simoom
[Link: www.chicagotribune.com…]
French forces have killed Abdelhamid Abou Zeid, one of the most feared commanders of al Qaeda’s north Africa wing, during an operation against Islamist fighters in mountainous northern Mali, Algeria’s Ennahar television said on Thursday.
Abou Zeid was among 40 militants killed three days ago in the foothills of the Adrar des Ifoghas mountains near the Algerian border, said Ennahar, which is well connected with Algeria’s security services.
French and Chadian troops have been hunting fighters there after a lightning campaign to dislodge them from northern Mali.
103 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:31:36pm |
@theplumlinegs He certainly wouldn’t be the first writer to deliberately drum up controversy to sell books.— Charles Johnson (@Green_Footballs) February 28, 2013
105 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:32:21pm |
re: #101 Gus
— Tony Perkins
I can tell you one thing, Tony Perkins is no friend of Israel and the Jewish people. Say what you want about Hagel but he never used David Duke’s mailing list like Tony did. And Duke’s hugely popularly with ant Israel activists around the globe.
107 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:33:28pm |
re: #104 Gus
What right wing antisemitism?
In case anyone thinks that’s a fringe group:
[Link: www.hrc.org…]
Mitt Romney delivered a video message to attendees at the Family Research Council’s Values Voter Summit this afternoon. Romney’s remarks follow an earlier appearance from Paul Ryan at the event.
In his message, Romney thanked Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council for their “leadership.” He went on to tell the audience that our nation needs a president who upholds “traditional values,” saying: “We will defend marriage, not try to redefine it.”
108 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:33:56pm |
re: #103 Charles Johnson
I’m assuming there must be constraints on how far Sargent is allowed to go in engaging with his WaPo coworkers.
109 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:34:20pm |
re: #100 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
It is not quite fifty years since Congressman Lewis was beaten down for having the temerity to insist that he was the equal of a white man. Are we really to pretend that all that poisonous racism has disappeared? When nailbombs that could kill hundred get planted in the northeast, while voter suppression affecting minorities outrageously is endorsed at the highest levels of the GOP? Really?
Can it be that the Supreme Court justices are ignorant of the cases that were raised under section 5? If so, how can they be questioning its relevance, whatever the arguments as to constitutionality?
It really makes me worried for the next generation of lawyers and judges. Remember, Scalia and Roberts have young clerks writing and researching for them. I have to say that I think a lot of young Americans of which I am one are ignorant to how recent the Civil Rights era was and how hard African Americans and others had to fight for their Civil Rights. Lewis was lucky to have survived but others like MLK, Medger Evers, and a hostful of others weren’t so lucky.
110 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:34:56pm |
re: #101 Gus
The irony would be after a furor about Hagel saying “Jewish lobby”, Perkins says “Jewish lobby”. It’s writing itself at this point. Wow.
111 | Political Atheist Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:35:25pm |
re: #81 jamesfirecat
Besides it’s worth remembering that one might have an immortal soul whether God is out there or not. Especially in the context of how TV preachers describe God.
112 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:37:58pm |
re: #107 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
In case anyone thinks that’s a fringe group:
[Link: www.hrc.org…]
Bleh. Remember when Romney freaked out on that radio show? Was about Mormonism…
113 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:41:04pm |
Sullivan pretty much echoes my take: Bob Woodward, Demonstrable Liar.
115 | Eclectic Cyborg Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:44:59pm |
re: #113 Charles Johnson
Sullivan pretty much echoes my take: Bob Woodward, Demonstrable Liar.
Do you think Woodward is just desperately trying to stay relevant? I hesitate to use the term “attention whore” but he certainly seems to enjoy the spotlight.
116 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:48:01pm |
re: #115 Eclectic Cyborg
Most likely explanation is that he’s doing it to sell books. IMHO.
117 | gwangung Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:48:44pm |
re: #109 HappyWarrior
It really makes me worried for the next generation of lawyers and judges. Remember, Scalia and Roberts have young clerks writing and researching for them. I have to say that I think a lot of young Americans of which I am one are ignorant to how recent the Civil Rights era was and how hard African Americans and others had to fight for their Civil Rights. Lewis was lucky to have survived but others like MLK, Medger Evers, and a hostful of others weren’t so lucky.
I think Americans don’t really realize HOW SHORT a time that civil rights was given. Voting rights, housing rights didn’t really get implemented until the late 60s, early 70s…and it only took until 1980 for cries of reverse discrimination and reverse racism to roll some of that back.
I’ll be blunt. Given how deep the racism was and how deeply rooted both social and government policy was anti-black, you’re an idiot to think the effects could be gotten rid of in only 15 years.
See what Coates is talking about here on how deep the anti-black rot was:
[Link: m.theatlantic.com…]
118 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:51:54pm |
Angry email to me dismissing the Woodward threat says they can’t take me seriously b/c Obama killed Breitbart and is coming after Bob. Sigh.— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) February 28, 2013
119 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:52:29pm |
re: #116 Charles Johnson
Most likely explanation is that he’s doing it to sell books. IMHO.
Think that was the point of the initial article, to drum up support for his book by tapping into the unbridled id that is the current GOP base. When he lost traction on the and started drawing flak, he tried to make his article “heroic” by saying how he’d defied the White House’s attempts to dissuade him from printing a article they didn’t like and how such things might have stopped a less experienced reporter. Thing is, Politico saw a potential “scandal” and ran with it as such, which turned his brave tale of standing up to White House opposition into him getting scared at a kindly worded bit of advice.
120 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:53:05pm |
re: #118 Gus
What’s the matter, Erick? You’ve lost control of the very monster you helped create?
121 | jamesfirecat Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:55:49pm |
re: #120 Targetpractice
What’s the matter, Erick? You’ve lost control of the very monster you helped create?
He must be all out of sedagives.
122 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:56:45pm |
re: #117 gwangung
I think Americans don’t really realize HOW SHORT a time that civil rights was given. Voting rights, housing rights didn’t really get implemented until the late 60s, early 70s…and it only took until 1980 for cries of reverse discrimination and reverse racism to roll some of that back.
I’ll be blunt. Given how deep the racism was and how deeply rooted both social and government policy was anti-black, you’re an idiot to think the effects could be gotten rid of in only 15 years.
We want to believe that we achieved racially harmony and the whole nation embraced MLK’s message quickly but for crying out loud Congress had to overwrite Reagan’s veto on the holiday. And the Republican party nominee just four years ago voted against it as a member of Congress. Of course, the funny thing is now you see right wingers tryign to claim MLK as their own which is the most hilarious since many of these same people were the ones calling civil rights activists, communists in the 60’s and beyond.
123 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:56:54pm |
re: #120 Targetpractice
What’s the matter, Erick? You’ve lost control of the very monster you helped create?
You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind.
124 | A Mom Anon Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:57:27pm |
re: #118 Gus
He’d better get used to sighing, A LOT. He helped to create these fucking monsters, so GOOD that they’re turning on him for a change. I’m finding it kind of hard to have much empathy for someone who was/is right in there being a cheerleader for this brand of fucking nightmare.
125 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:57:31pm |
re: #120 Targetpractice
What’s the matter, Erick? You’ve lost control of the very monster you helped create?
I iz goin’ te git my wifes shotgun if the CENSUS man comes to mah door!
126 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:57:44pm |
re: #118 Gus
I hate to use a cliche but you really reap what you sow Erick. I do feel a little bad for him having to read that kooky shit though but hey welcome to the real world buddy.
127 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:58:09pm |
Just read what I thought was a @green_footballs tweet mocking right wing crazies, than realized it was @ewerickson— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) February 28, 2013
128 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:58:15pm |
re: #124 A Mom Anon
He’d better get used to sighing, A LOT. He helped to create these fucking monsters, so GOOD that they’re turning on him for a change. I’m finding it kind of hard to have much empathy for someone who was/is right in there being a cheerleader for this brand of fucking nightmare.
That’s why I don’t have much empathy for him. I still have some. Bleeding heart and all that jazz.
129 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:59:01pm |
re: #127 Charles Johnson
Somebody call the Onion, tell them to pack it, reality has trumped fantasy.
130 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 2:59:19pm |
You create the beast. You clean up the beast’s shit. I expect some or even many of the right wingers who have called this out to try to twist this to be the left’s fault anyhow because there’s never any personal accountability with the right these days.
131 | EPR-radar Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:02:07pm |
re: #98 HappyWarrior
We’ve gone from the vast majority of Republicans and Democrats voting for the VRA and subsequent decades confirmation of its constitutionality to John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, saying it’s not constitutional. This is real judicial activism. A true judicial conservative like many of the judges on the Warren and later Burger court would understand precedence and the fact that the law has worked as intended. And yes, I’m angry, angry that Chief Justice Roberts would try to twist this in to oh woe the poor South is being discriminated against and Scalia’s claim that it’s just a pretty worded law and that crap about racial entitlements. These are both men that Republican presidential candidates want their model justices to be. There’s a lot of reasons to oppose the Republican party but considering judicial appointments are for life or last years after that executive leaves, Republican judiciary picks are a very simple and obvious reason to oppose that party.
Roberts and Scalia are making the VRA out to be an instance of ‘get whitey’. Perhaps Scalia will even use that term in his writing on the case.
132 | FriendsofHummus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:03:44pm |
re: #131 EPR-radar
Roberts and Scalia are making the VRA out to be an instance of ‘get whitey’. Perhaps Scalia will even use that term in his writing on the case.
Not just get whitey but get Southern whitey. Roberts’ stupid question was a whistle to all the Southern whites who can’t stand being told that their history isn’t so great.
133 | A Mom Anon Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:04:28pm |
re: #128 HappyWarrior
I’ll have empathy for him the day he starts wading through Red State and denouncing the hateful assholishness that’s flourished there for years. When he steps up and says he was a jerk and he was wrong, then I’ll let my empathy kick in. Til then, not so much. This kind of shit tore my family up and ruined friendships that will never be repaired because people I cared for took his crap at Red State and the sites his fellow conservatives run as gospel truth. So the hell with him til he wises up and realizes his party is poisoned and he provided his fair share of the toxins.
134 | Eclectic Cyborg Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:06:04pm |
re: #129 Targetpractice
Somebody call the Onion, tell them to pack it, reality has trumped fantasy.
That could actually be a funny story over there:
ONION TAPS OUT TO REALITY. ‘WE’RE NOT WORTHY’
135 | EPR-radar Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:06:53pm |
re: #128 HappyWarrior
That’s why I don’t have much empathy for him. I still have some. Bleeding heart and all that jazz.
Zero empathy from me. Movement conservatism is a plague on the political landscape that may yet ruin the US and already has contributed more than its fair share to global destruction via unchecked climate change.
136 | ProBosniaLiberal Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:08:52pm |
I see the Hague has acquitted a Serbian Mass Murderer today.
Fortunately, one of the Razakar Architects of the 1971 Bengali Genocide has been sentenced to death. Unfortunately, Jamaat-i-Islami has started rioting, and there are 15 dead.
Time for the US to declare Jamaat-I-Islami a Terrorist Organization. Starting pulling in all American Sympathizers to them in for questioning, and determine if any can be charged for supporting Terrorism in relation to the riots right now, or for Genocide in 1971.
In regards to the Genocide, us putting charges on people involved in it would not be unheard of. The Metropolitan Police in London have mulled bringing charges to those who had culpability in that Genocide who reside in London.
137 | ProBosniaLiberal Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:19:12pm |
re: #136 ProBosniaLiberal
In fact, these little riots have found my last nerve. I’ll contact a Congressman. Better than nothing, right?
138 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:23:46pm |
This is kind of interesting
Report: UK stripping terrorism suspects of citizenship, US killing some of them
139 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:27:32pm |
Since it seems we’re going over the fiscal cliff tomorrow you’d the there’d be a lot of coverage about what to expect, economic impact, long and sort term consequences, when/how it might be resolved. Almost nothing. Mostly just coverage of the “he said/she said” finger pointing.
140 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:28:54pm |
re: #139 Killgore Trout
Since it seems we’re going over the fiscal cliff tomorrow you’d the there’d be a lot of coverage about what to expect, economic impact, long and sort term consequences, when/how it might be resolved. Almost nothing. Mostly just coverage of the “he said/she said” finger pointing.
Actually, the media is acting kind of like you are on this issue.
MBFing the hell out of it.
;)
141 | NJDhockeyfan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:29:48pm |
re: #139 Killgore Trout
Since it seems we’re going over the fiscal cliff tomorrow you’d the there’d be a lot of coverage about what to expect, economic impact, long and sort term consequences, when/how it might be resolved. Almost nothing. Mostly just coverage of the “he said/she said” finger pointing.
Tomorrow is my 50th birthday. I hope that’s not my bday present.
142 | EPR-radar Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:30:12pm |
re: #139 Killgore Trout
Since it seems we’re going over the fiscal cliff tomorrow you’d the there’d be a lot of coverage about what to expect, economic impact, long and sort term consequences, when/how it might be resolved. Almost nothing. Mostly just coverage of the “he said/she said” finger pointing.
From a cynical POV, this makes perfect sense. Trouble is inevitable, who gets the blame for it is to be determined.
143 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:32:57pm |
re: #141 NJDhockeyfan
Tomorrow is my 50th birthday. I hope that’s not my bday present.
Happy Bday! Any special plans?
144 | ProBosniaLiberal Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:34:56pm |
Apparently, the big ol’ scary Muslim Brotherhood is frightened by….the Harlem Shake.
This is where I point and laugh at them.
145 | NJDhockeyfan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:35:59pm |
re: #143 Killgore Trout
Happy Bday! Any special plans?
Thanks!
Dinner and a movie on Saturday. We have a new restaurant in town and the steaks look real good.
146 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:36:19pm |
re: #142 EPR-radar
From a cynical POV, this makes perfect sense. Trouble is inevitable, who gets the blame for it is to be determined.
I just want to know how to prepare myself. I was planing on a business trip to London this spring, not sure if that’s wise. If there’s another economic downturn I need to hold on to my money to ride it out.
147 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:38:05pm |
South Dakota Legislature Approves ‘Women Can’t Think on Weekends’ Bill
South Dakota’s state senate today passed a bill that would extend the mandatory 72 hour waiting period women face when seeking an abortion in the state to specifically exclude weekend days and holidays from counting towards the 72 hour period. Apparently, South Dakota’s Republican lawmakers think women aren’t able to think as well on weekends.
148 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:38:37pm |
re: #146 Killgore Trout
I just want to know how to prepare myself. I was planing on a business trip to London this spring, not sure if that’s wise. If there’s another economic downturn I need to hold on to my money to ride it out.
I’d wait and see how this plays out over the next couple weeks.
149 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:38:38pm |
re: #145 NJDhockeyfan
Thanks!
Dinner and a movie on Saturday. We have a new restaurant in town and the steaks look real good.
That does look good.
150 | Targetpractice Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:39:29pm |
re: #146 Killgore Trout
I just want to know how to prepare myself. I was planing on a business trip to London this spring, not sure if that’s wise. If there’s another economic downturn I need to hold on to my money to ride it out.
Before or after the end of next month?
151 | EPR-radar Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:39:33pm |
re: #146 Killgore Trout
I just want to know how to prepare myself. I was planing on a business trip to London this spring, not sure if that’s wise. If there’s another economic downturn I need to hold on to my money to ride it out.
I see. I’d be surprised if there is any useful information out there at this time. If/when this hits, a bunch of agencies are going to be making unplanned budget cuts. Seems impossible to predict in detail what will happen.
152 | EPR-radar Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:42:21pm |
re: #147 Kragar (Antichrist )
re: #147 Kragar (Antichrist )
South Dakota Legislature Approves ‘Women Can’t Think on Weekends’ Bill
Mission creep. 3 days becomes 3 business days, becomes 9 days, becomes 9 days that are each the first days of a month, and voila, we have an abortion ban.
No compromise with these jokers.
153 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:43:45pm |
Scenes from the rally to repeal the NY SAFE Act
posted Feb 28, 2013
155 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:44:41pm |
re: #147 Kragar (Antichrist )
South Dakota Legislature Approves ‘Women Can’t Think on Weekends’ Bill
If you want that abortion then, by God, you’ll pay for it!
//
156 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:45:45pm |
157 | lawhawk Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:46:31pm |
So, Chuck Todd was tweeting earlier today about how the Administration and Congress is having trouble answering questions over how they could proffer $60b for Sandy relief, but find $85b in cuts to be apocalyptic.
@chucktodd Do you mean they can spend $60 billion for Sandy projects w/o a 2nd thought, but $85 billion is the end of govt as we know it?— Burnham (@NathanABurnham) February 28, 2013
That last RT about $60B for Sandy vs. $85B for rest of gov’t is a question I get a lot. And it’s one the admin and Congress struggle with— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) February 28, 2013
Sandy relief actually was $50b - $9b+ was for re-filling the NFIP (flood insurance program). The remainder was to help the disaster stricken areas rebuild and get taxpayers back on their feet. But I digress.
After all, billions of dollars in damage was done to infrastructure and hit the most densely populated area in the nation. That’s a critical part of the national and local economy at stake. The longer the delay in getting aid flowing, the longer the recovery will take and undermine the economic recovery. That means tax revenues will be lower until businesses and individuals are back on their feet.
Consider just one portion of all that damage: Billions in damage was done to the MTA, which moves more than 5 million people daily. NJ Transit moves another 1 million a day. PATH moves another 250,000 a day. Combined, that’s more than all but 18 state populations. Each day.
So, in that respect - yeah, the dollar figures are comparable. The Sandy expenditures were critical in getting the region restored just as avoiding $85 billion in cuts across a wide range of programs can lead to dire consequences.
But in another respect, we’re talking about two completely different things. One is to help restore a damaged region so that it can again fully operate (including getting businesses up and running so that the economy - and the tax revenues - can flow).
The sequester is across the board cuts that don’t care what is cut - everything is cut equally. NOAA budget? It’s cut just as surely as HUD. Or Education or Energy. Or Commerce.
And the sequester, unless a suitable replacement is enacted, will be a cut that happens year after year. The $85b is only the cost during this current fiscal year (or what’s left of it).
158 | lawhawk Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:50:46pm |
Oh, and this gets to something I’ve been saying for a while: there are a whole lot of people in Congress (especially a whole lot of GOPers) who have no problem with the sequester at all.
One dirty little secret about sequester: cap hill veterans of BOTH parties admit they’d never be able to cut this much if left on their own— Chuck Todd (@chucktodd) February 28, 2013
159 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:52:18pm |
WND’s Erik Rush condemns American liberals for making South Africa end Apartheid
WARNING: LINK IS TO WND
160 | efuseakay Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:55:29pm |
re: #102 simoom
[Link: www.chicagotribune.com…]
Good news, but as soon as France pulls out, they will all come flooding back into Mali, I’m afraid.
161 | NJDhockeyfan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:55:50pm |
This is considered comedy?
Rivers Called On To Apologize For Comparing Klum’s Dress To The Holocaust
LOS ANGELES (CBS Los Angeles) – Joan Rivers might not be invited to Seder this year.
Rivers is in hot water over comments she made earlier in the week that used Nazi Germany to compliment a dress worn by supermodel Heidi Klum. During a segment on her E! Entertainment Television show “Fashion Police” on Monday, Rivers raised eyebrows with her comment about a dress worn by Klum, a prominent German-American.
“The last time a German looked this hot was when they were pushing Jews into the ovens,” Rivers said.
The comment was met with laughter from Rivers and her co-hosts. Rivers nor E! issued an apology for the remark, even as the segment has gone on to air another four times this week on the network.
162 | Hercules Grytpype-Thynneghazi Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:58:46pm |
re: #31 makeitstop
Ohhhhh. Pontiff Ex….. Now I git it.
Actually “pontifex” is just the Latin word for high priest, and the source of our word “pontiff”. They still do Latin in the Vatican.
163 | efuseakay Thu, Feb 28, 2013 3:59:14pm |
re: #161 NJDhockeyfan
This is considered comedy?
Rivers Called On To Apologize For Comparing Klum’s Dress To The Holocaust
GWAR should have taken over her show.
164 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:02:22pm |
re: #141 NJDhockeyfan
Tomorrow is my 50th birthday. I hope that’s not my bday present.
Happy Birthday!
Party hearty tonight cause tomorrow you are over the hill and its all over but the…//
165 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:03:40pm |
re: #163 efuseakay
GWAR should have taken over her show.
With a battle cry go forth, which is “Give the people what they want.”
166 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:03:51pm |
re: #141 NJDhockeyfan
Tomorrow is my 50th birthday. I hope that’s not my bday present.
167 | NJDhockeyfan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:04:07pm |
re: #164 blueraven
Happy Birthday!
Party hearty tonight cause tomorrow you are over the hill and its all over but the…//
I met an elderly woman the other day who turned 88 last week. She said I looked 27. I’m going hang on to that for a while.
168 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:04:48pm |
I was watching the Fox Special Report panel and Bret Baier just used that Plouffe tweet to attack the White House, calling Plouffe a “senior white house adviser.”
The thing is, Plouffe left the admin in Jan., so he doesn’t have to answer to Baier’s feigned outrage anymore:
Watching Woodward last 2 days is like imagining my idol Mike Schmidt facing live pitching again. Perfection gained once is rarely repeated.— David Plouffe (@davidplouffe) February 28, 2013
169 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:04:52pm |
re: #167 NJDhockeyfan
I met an elderly woman the other day who turned 88 last week. She said I looked 27. I’m going hang on to that for a while.
Its all relative, I guess.
170 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:06:05pm |
re: #168 simoom
I was watch the Fox Special Report panel and Bret Baier just used that Plouffe tweet to attack the White House, calling Plouffe a “senior white house adviser.”
The thing is, Plouffe left the admin in Jan., so he doesn’t have to answer to Baier’s feigned outrage anymore:
Yes, and even Krauthammer said there was absolutely no threat implied or otherwise in that email.
171 | Hercules Grytpype-Thynneghazi Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:06:51pm |
re: #157 lawhawk
So, Chuck Todd was tweeting earlier today about how the Administration and Congress is having trouble answering questions over how they could proffer $60b for Sandy relief, but find $85b in cuts to be apocalyptic.
Sandy relief actually was $50b - $9b+ was for re-filling the NFIP (flood insurance program). The remainder was to help the disaster stricken areas rebuild and get taxpayers back on their feet. But I digress.
After all, billions of dollars in damage was done to infrastructure and hit the most densely populated area in the nation. That’s a critical part of the national and local economy at stake. The longer the delay in getting aid flowing, the longer the recovery will take and undermine the economic recovery. That means tax revenues will be lower until businesses and individuals are back on their feet.
Consider just one portion of all that damage: Billions in damage was done to the MTA, which moves more than 5 million people daily. NJ Transit moves another 1 million a day. PATH moves another 250,000 a day. Combined, that’s more than all but 18 state populations. Each day.
So, in that respect - yeah, the dollar figures are comparable. The Sandy expenditures were critical in getting the region restored just as avoiding $85 billion in cuts across a wide range of programs can lead to dire consequences.
But in another respect, we’re talking about two completely different things. One is to help restore a damaged region so that it can again fully operate (including getting businesses up and running so that the economy - and the tax revenues - can flow).
The sequester is across the board cuts that don’t care what is cut - everything is cut equally. NOAA budget? It’s cut just as surely as HUD. Or Education or Energy. Or Commerce.
And the sequester, unless a suitable replacement is enacted, will be a cut that happens year after year. The $85b is only the cost during this current fiscal year (or what’s left of it).
News flash: If you spend money, you can buy shit with it. $60 billion worth of shit for relief of hurricane victims, or $85 billion worth of shit for government services for all of us.
172 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:07:51pm |
re: #170 blueraven
Yes, and even Krauthammer said there was absolutely no threat implied or otherwise in that email.
Yeah, I was surprised they didn’t quite keep it together (the threat narrative), at least through to the Hannity interview.
173 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:14:55pm |
Some idiot that I had to block the other morning. Check out all of his Tweets over what started as a polite fact check from me. I sent him that first one and then boom! One right after the other within seconds.
174 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:16:14pm |
re: #173 Gus
@danielpeavey If I took him seriously my twitter account would have been suspended and law enforcement would’ve surrounded my bunker by now— Bryan Henry (@lightgood) February 26, 2013
Er…
Real tough twitter guy.
175 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:16:36pm |
re: #172 simoom
Yeah, I was surprised they didn’t quite keep it together (the threat narrative), at least through to the Hannity interview.
The thing is, all pols including congress and WH staff push back against reporters who they think are not correctly stating the facts. And reporters push back against the pols.
The tone between all of them may be nastier these days, just like everything else. But there was no threat or intimidation in that email. In fact the opposite is true, it was quite a friendly and civil disagreement.
177 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:17:39pm |
re: #174 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
Er…
Check it out. He’s still thinking about me.
Fun with Twitter ? twitter.com/lightgood/stat…— Bryan Henry (@lightgood) March 1, 2013
179 | Interesting Times Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:19:05pm |
Justice Scalia: “And it’s not just the Voting Rights Act. I intend to rule Black History Month unconstitutional as well.”— Top Conservative Cat (@TeaPartyCat) February 28, 2013
180 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:20:21pm |
International Monetary Fund: ‘Sequester’ cuts will slow global economic growth
The broad US “sequester” spending cuts that take effect beginning Friday will slow growth in the world’s biggest economy and hit the global economy, the International Monetary Fund said Thursday.
“There will be an impact on global growth,” IMF spokesman Bill Murray said. “We’ll have to reevaluate our growth forecast for the United States and also our other forecasts.”
Murray emphasized that the $85 billion in US spending cuts, known as sequestration, would be phased in over seven months. The sequestration also includes $109 billion in cuts over the following eight years.
181 | Interesting Times Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:21:30pm |
re: #178 Gus
2 days later. Wow. Cucko!
You should ask him if he’s in a) a right-to-work state and b) if he’s doing all this on company time :P
182 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:24:13pm |
re: #175 blueraven
The thing is, all pols including congress and WH staff push back against reporters who they think are not correctly stating the facts. And reporters push back against the pols.
The tone between all of them may be nastier these days, just like everything else. But there was no threat or intimidation in that email. In fact the opposite is true, it was quite a friendly and civil disagreement.
I’m sure it’s fairly common, there have been a handful of others coming forward today to say someone on the White House leaned on them about something or other. I’m sure if you dig through the archives there is no shortage of similar allegations from previous presidents. I think Woodward’s ego may also be a factor. He’s been a DC rockstar celebrity and journalistic hero for a very long time. Until recently he’s probably always been treated with kid gloves. The era of his brand of investigative journalism is over. The mainstream journalists are easily to roll over because they’re lazy and not very interested in anything other than collecting soundbites and the partisan media is a willing proxy for their respective parties. Woodward isn’t needed or respected anymore. I think he was a little hurt to be treated like everyone else.
183 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:26:20pm |
Constituents laugh at Republican’s ignorance of trans-vaginal ultrasounds
Duffy was asked whether he supported the Woman’s Right to Know her Unborn Child Act, which would require a woman to receive a trans-vaginal ultrasound prior to terminating her pregnancy. Top Republicans in the Wisconsin legislature have said the bill was a “priority” and “long overdue.”
But Duffy said he didn’t know what a trans-vaginal ultrasound was.
“I haven’t had one,” he remarked.
His comment was greeted with laughter.
“I haven’t heard of it,” Duffy added. “And just like I told you I’m pro life, and I know that you are too, but I’m not willing to say I’ll support what you’re talking about because I haven’t seen the bill, even though we’re probably in agreement on that issue.”
Nothing Orwellian about the name of that bill at all.
184 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:27:54pm |
re: #182 Killgore Trout
But the White House didn’t lean on Woodward.
185 | dragonath Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:28:31pm |
re: #180 Kragar (Antichrist )
International Monetary Fund: ‘Sequester’ cuts will slow global economic growth
When even the IMF says you’re too austere, you know ur doing it wrong.
186 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:28:39pm |
re: #182 Killgore Trout
I’m sure it’s fairly common, there have been a handful of others coming forward today to say someone on the White House leaned on them about something or other. I’m sure if you dig through the archives there is no shortage of similar allegations from previous presidents. I think Woodward’s ego may also be a factor. He’s been a DC rockstar celebrity and journalistic hero for a very long time. Until recently he’s probably always been treated with kid gloves. The era of his brand of investigative journalism is over. The mainstream journalists are easily to roll over because they’re lazy and not very interested in anything other than collecting soundbites and the partisan media is a willing proxy for their respective parties. Woodward isn’t needed or respected anymore. I think he was a little hurt to be treated like everyone else.
I think that’s a load of crap.
There are many good reporters out there, and Woodward brought this all on himself.
187 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:30:22pm |
re: #182 Killgore Trout
I’m sure it’s fairly common, there have been a handful of others coming forward today to say someone on the White House leaned on them about something or other. I’m sure if you dig through the archives there is no shortage of similar allegations from previous presidents. I think Woodward’s ego may also be a factor. He’s been a DC rockstar celebrity and journalistic hero for a very long time. Until recently he’s probably always been treated with kid gloves. The era of his brand of investigative journalism is over. The mainstream journalists are easily to roll over because they’re lazy and not very interested in anything other than collecting soundbites and the partisan media is a willing proxy for their respective parties. Woodward isn’t needed or respected anymore. I think he was a little hurt to be treated like everyone else.
Having read the full exchange of e-mails, I’m not sure if I would even say there’s leaning going on here. I mean, the sentence in question reads:
But I do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying saying that Potus asking for revenues is moving the goal post. I know you may not believe this, but as a friend, I think you will regret staking out that claim.
I mean, if someone I considered a friend and respected was about to make a claim that the facts didn’t support and logic said was bullshit, I’d say that they’d regret saying that in public too. And because I try to be a good friend, I’d tell them so, because better to hear it from me and think about it than to deal with the egg on their face in public.
Of course, your read may be different. All we have are words on a page, after all.
188 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:31:21pm |
re: #187 klys
And Woodward should regret saying that bullshit, because it’s bullshit.
189 | dragonath Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:31:36pm |
re: #182 Killgore Trout
The mainstream journalists are easily to roll over because they’re lazy and not very interested in anything other than collecting soundbites and the partisan media is a willing proxy for their respective parties.
Sweet, this is coming from Mr. “I troll for articles to confirm my pre-existing biases about OWS”
190 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:32:09pm |
We already know what rats think, Bryan, because we can read your tweets.
Implant Makes Mind Reading Possible in Rats. Great! Always wanted to know what rats think. t.usnews.com/a44CD8— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 28, 2013
191 | calochortus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:34:09pm |
re: #190 Vicious Babushka
I’m sure he doesn’t ever use anything that is the result of scientific or medical advances.
192 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:34:47pm |
re: #190 Vicious Babushka
We already know what rats think, Bryan, because we can read your tweets.
Because science is THE DEVIL!
193 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:38:21pm |
re: #187 klys
Also remember that the prelude to that email was a heated exchange where Woodward was being yelled at over his planned story. When anger didn’t work the tactic was changed to see if sowing the seed of self doubt. The whole reason White House aides talk to the press is to get their message out in a favorable way. It’s their job.
194 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:42:27pm |
re: #193 Killgore Trout
But Woodward’s position is actually wrong. Obama hasn’t moved any goalposts. It’s as much of a ‘tactic’ to tell him that as me calling my senator to talk about an issue is a ‘tactic’. It’s meaningless to call it a tactic, except to awkwardly cover your ass for falling for this nontroversy early on.
195 | Kragar (Antichrist ) Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:42:49pm |
… expert opinion is not enough to convince the scribes at National Review Online, which issued its own rebuttal to the Times piece and proclaimed — without a shred of evidence — that the hardships befallen upon Jackson and as many as 1 in 5 of all female servicemembers are attributable to their upbringing in underprivileged communities and not to their sexual assaults. And they engage in an especially pernicious form of victim-blaming in the process:
Now here is a tentative alternative hypothesis: Some of these women come from environments that made their descent into street life overdetermined, whether or not they experienced alleged sexual assault in the military. To blame alleged sexual assault for their fate rather than their own bad decision-making is ideologically satisfying, but mystifying. Having children out of wedlock, as a huge proportion of them do, also does not help in avoiding poverty and homelessness…
But let’s say that for these homeless female vets, it really was their sexual experiences in the military that caused their downward spiral into, as the Times puts it, “alcohol and substance abuse, depression and domestic violence.” Why then have those same feminists who are now lamenting the life-destroying effects of “MST” insisted on putting women into combat units?
196 | b_sharp Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:43:41pm |
re: #193 Killgore Trout
Also remember that the prelude to that email was a heated exchange where Woodward was being yelled at over his planned story. When anger didn’t work the tactic was changed to see if sowing the seed of self doubt. The whole reason White House aides talk to the press is to get their message out in a favorable way. It’s their job.
Convincing isn’t manipulation and manipulation isn’t coercion. The furor is over putative coercion.
197 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:46:14pm |
PROOF MLK was not a Republican
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. did not publicly endorse any political party but always voted DEMOCRAT. bit.ly/XG8yM0 #UniteBlue #tgdn— Vicious Babushka (@viciousbabushka) March 1, 2013
Source: [Link: books.google.com…]
198 | HoosierHoops Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:47:53pm |
15 minutes till Woodward is on Fox. I’m doing the unthinkable and recording the interview. I have respected his reporting for years and this will be interesting to hear.
199 | HoosierHoops Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:49:28pm |
re: #198 HoosierHoops
15 minutes till Woodward is on Fox. I’m doing the unthinkable and recording the interview. I have respected his reporting for years and this will be interesting to hear.
whoops 1 hour and 15 minutes away. He is on Hannity? Strange venue for a world class reporter.
200 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:50:16pm |
re: #193 Killgore Trout
Also remember that the prelude to that email was a heated exchange where Woodward was being yelled at over his planned story. When anger didn’t work the tactic was changed to see if sowing the seed of self doubt. The whole reason White House aides talk to the press is to get their message out in a favorable way. It’s their job.
The planned story of …what? That the idea for sequester originated with the White House? Nothing in the e-mail seems to take issue with that part of the story.
The objection seems to the to the part where he says that President Obama “moved the goalposts” in response to wanting to substitute in a compromise of spending cuts and revenue increases in place of the sequester. The part that has most of us scratching our heads is the part where that was the whole point of the sequester: to force a compromise, which most reasonable people really did expect to include both spending cuts and revenue increases.
I don’t see how that is moving the goalposts. If I had a friend about to put that bullshit out there, I’d tell them that. Sometimes loudly if I thought they were being a real idiot.
201 | Iwouldprefernotto Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:50:39pm |
203 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:59:35pm |
I saw this tweet from Politico’s Dylan Byers last night and I finally understand the reference:
Shorter White House to Woodward: “Don’t give fodder to the fuckers!” politi.co/YGUjqs— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) February 28, 2013
[Link: nymag.com…]
In early December, Judge John Sirica was told by prosecutors that a grand juror had been approached by the Post reporters but had revealed nothing. Incensed, Sirica called Woodward and Bernstein into court two weeks later and warned against any further meddling. “Had they actually obtained information from that grand juror,” he wrote later, “they would have gone to jail.” According to the Post’s lawyers, who negotiated on their behalf, Sirica almost locked them up anyway.
…
It was late at night. I was sitting in a remote farmhouse in Rapidan, Virginia, and I could hardly believe what I was reading. For four decades, Carl and Bob have insisted that the grand jurors they contacted had given them no information. For four decades, that story endured, as it was replayed in interviews and reread in library copies of All The President’s Men, and as Woodward and Bernstein and Bradlee became a holy trinity of newspaper journalism. But, according to the memo, it didn’t appear to be true: Z was no mystic; she was a grand juror in disguise, and had apparently broken the law by talking. Woodward and Bernstein had always denied it—in 1974, and as recently as 2011.
…
When I had a conference call with Carl and Bob last week to ask them to comment on Z’s identity, they conceded that she was a grand juror, but insisted that Carl hadn’t known it when he first went to visit her and said they’d disguised her only to protect their source. They said they’d long since forgotten the episode. “This is a footnote to a footnote,” Bob protested. But perhaps the most telling moment had occurred when I reached Carl on his own, earlier that day. Right before we hung up, he had said, wryly, “Maybe they’ll send us to jail after all.”
…
Later in the interview, Ben talked about Bob’s famous secret source, whom he claimed to have met in an underground garage in rendezvous arranged via signals involving flowerpots and newspapers. “You know I have a little problem with Deep Throat,” Ben told Barbara.
Did that potted [plant] incident ever happen? … and meeting in some garage. One meeting in the garage? Fifty meetings in the garage? I don’t know how many meetings in the garage … There’s a residual fear in my soul that that isn’t quite straight.
…
Bob turned to me. I had worked for him; he had given an impromptu toast at my wedding. You know me and the world we live in, he said. People who didn’t like him and didn’t like the Post—the “fuckers out there,” as Ben had called them—were going to seize on these comments. “Don’t give fodder to the fuckers,” Bob said, and once he lit on this phrase he repeated it a couple of times. The quotes from the interview with Barbara were nothing more than outtakes from Ben’s book, he said. Ben hadn’t used them, and so I shouldn’t use them, either.
That argument didn’t make sense, and I said so. Bob told me it was his “strong recommendation” that I not use the quotes, then that it was his “emphatic recommendation.” Then, when that got no truck: “Don’t use the quotes, Jeff.”
He closed by making a direct, personal appeal to Ben. “You’re this legend,” he said. “You’re the editor.” Ben’s doubts were going to mean something to people. Ben did his aw-shucks routine, but he had clearly made the calculation that Nixon’s resignation, and the reporting that had contributed to it, weren’t contingent on whether Deep Throat had watched Bob’s balcony for flowerpot updates. That was on Bob and Carl, not on Ben or on the Post.
204 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 4:59:46pm |
205 | HoosierHoops Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:00:08pm |
re: #201 Iwouldprefernotto
re: #199 HoosierHoops
Not if you want to sell books.
Maybe..I guess..Has he ever gone on Fox to sell books before? He doesn’t strike me to ever needing to go to a RW site to peddle his wares.
I’ll keep an open mind to this..One of my favorite movies is All the Presidents men..After 40 years why would he sell out to the RW? Like I said..I’ll record this and keep an open mind.. But Hannity? Why the hell him?
206 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:01:04pm |
re: #203 simoom
I saw this tweet from Politico’s Dylan Byers last night and I finally understand the reference:
[Link: nymag.com…]
Ha. Just read the Tweet and lights went off because I just finished reading that NY Mag piece. “Don’t give fodder to the fuckers!”
207 | blueraven Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:03:26pm |
re: #193 Killgore Trout
Also remember that the prelude to that email was a heated exchange where Woodward was being yelled at over his planned story. When anger didn’t work the tactic was changed to see if sowing the seed of self doubt. The whole reason White House aides talk to the press is to get their message out in a favorable way. It’s their job.
Wow, now you are psychoanalyzing. Or maybe you were there to hear the phone conversation? Maybe they were both yelling.
Some people cant admit that they may have possibly made a mistake.
208 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:03:28pm |
re: #205 HoosierHoops
Maybe..I guess..Has he ever gone on Fox to sell books before? He doesn’t strike me to ever needing to go to a RW site to peddle his wares.
I’ll keep an open mind to this..One of my favorite movies is All the Presidents men..After 40 years why would he sell out to the RW? Like I said..I’ll record this and keep an open mind.. But Hannity? Why the hell him?
Make up a fake threat.
Wingnuts get all umgebroyzelt.
Profit!
209 | NJDhockeyfan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:04:15pm |
Russian meteorite was just a common large space rock
You can safely disregard any conspiracy theories regarding the meteorite that lit up the sky in Russia earlier this month. Astronomers have confirmed that the meteorite was actually just a piece of chondrite space rock, an item commonly found flying around the Solar System.
Despite its seemingly ordinary nature, this particular piece of space rock had an interesting life. Scientists from Ural Federal University, who recovered pieces of the rock earlier in the week, are busy finding out facts about the space rock. For instance, this one spent 4.5 billion years floating around the solar system before it entered Earth’s atmosphere. Plus, it was quite the whopper, weighing in at 10,000 tons.
210 | Iwouldprefernotto Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:09:54pm |
re: #205 HoosierHoops
Maybe..I guess..Has he ever gone on Fox to sell books before? He doesn’t strike me to ever needing to go to a RW site to peddle his wares.
I’ll keep an open mind to this..One of my favorite movies is All the Presidents men..After 40 years why would he sell out to the RW? Like I said..I’ll record this and keep an open mind.. But Hannity? Why the hell him?
Woodward is chasing the Dragon. Watergate was huge. Very few reporters have done what he did. He will never repeat it, but he’s going to try, even if it means completely selling out. He’s the aging athlete trying to relive his glory days. It’s just sad.
211 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:11:09pm |
Gotta watch out with God. Remember what He did to us humans with the Noah flood. He might want to start all over again without consulting us first. Right now it looks like God is throwing rocks at Earth.
//
212 | b_sharp Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:12:14pm |
re: #211 Gus
Gotta watch out with God. Remember what He did to us humans with the Noah flood. He might want to start all over again without consulting us first. Right now it looks like God is throwing rocks at Earth.
//
Since all the water on Earth came from comets it looks like he’s slowing down in his old age.
213 | Political Atheist Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:23:23pm |
*Groan*
There is nothing like a gas tax increase over a budget shortfall because of gas conservation efforts. No good deed goes unpunished in California.
Yet another 3.5 cents in gas tax. So more expensive gas means less demand means more taxes means less gas used means budget shortfall that results in a tax increase….
Circular logic is a poor debate tactic but an excellent revenue enhancer!
Highest gas tax in the country. As inflationary and retrogressive as can be.
214 | Amory Blaine Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:25:25pm |
Could also promote further conservation efforts.
215 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:29:09pm |
[Link: www.politico.com…]
Bob Woodward is seeking to distance himself from reports that he felt “threatened” by the White House, more than 24 hours after criticizing senior White House aide Gene Sperling for telling him he might regret questioning Obama’s account of how sequestration came about.
In an interview with his own paper, The Washington Post, Woodward says he never called Sperling’s comment a threat.
“I never characterized it as a ‘threat.’ I think that was Politico’s word,” he said, referring to the story about his initial interview with POLITICO.
For the record, CNN’s @wolfblitzer referred to it as a “threat” in their interview and Bob Woodward didn’t flinch. He said, “Indeed.”— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) March 1, 2013
216 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:29:38pm |
re: #213 Political Atheist
I agree. Gas taxes are an easy but short-sighted revenue mechanism. If they were part of a broad pigovian system it’d be different, but as they stand they just serve to raise costs for ordinary citizens— and as those who have to commute the farthest are in the lowest-paying jobs, it is, as you say, regressive.
217 | Political Atheist Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:30:19pm |
re: #214 Amory Blaine
Could also promote further conservation efforts.
Already did that, got the T-shirt and raised the tax accordingly. I’m sure the brand spanking new legislative super majority had nothing to do with this. It was our “Board of Equalization” that did this. Heh a rather Orwellian name for a tax committee that seems weirdly perfect.
218 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:30:57pm |
re: #215 simoom
[Link: www.politico.com…]
I’m going to file this under the “maybe he’s regretting it a little bit” category.
219 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:32:40pm |
Sheesh, my respect for Woodward is now at 0.
Sad.
220 | Political Atheist Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:33:15pm |
re: #216 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
Thanks. Gas taxes used to be dedicated to our roads and highways. Then they got stolen (please forgive my frustration and resulting hyperbole) by the general fund and off we went. I like the old system. Gas taxes dedicated to vehicle infrastructure. At least that offers a balance of need and tax rate.
221 | Amory Blaine Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:34:19pm |
Lawmaker: Make all Idaho adults militia members
Lawmakers fearful the U.S. Supreme Court might one day reverse itself on the issue of individual gun rights aim to change the Idaho Constitution’s definition of a militia to include all the state’s adults.
That way, argued Sen. Jim Rice of Caldwell Wednesday in the Senate State Affairs Committee, the federal government could never swoop in and disarm residents.
Rice wants to put the amendment before voters in the November 2014 election, calling it an important “backstop” to existing protections of individual gun rights.
222 | simoom Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:36:02pm |
re: #218 klys
I’m going to file this under the “maybe he’s regretting it a little bit” category.
I imagine Politico is too, having gone all in with Woodward yesterday:
come on, man RT @nycjim: Woodward: “I never characterized it as a ‘threat.’ I think that was Politico’s word.” wapo.st/VfmLQo— Alex Burns (@aburnspolitico) March 1, 2013
223 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:36:21pm |
re: #220 Political Atheist
Thanks. Gas taxes used to be dedicated to our roads and highways. Then they got stolen (please forgive my frustration and resulting hyperbole) by the general fund and off we went. I like the old system. Gas taxes dedicated to vehicle infrastructure. At least that offers a balance of need and tax rate.
Agreed, although that model will also face increased challenges with improvements to MPG and increases in electric cars.
224 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:37:16pm |
re: #221 Amory Blaine
That ran yesterday. Wife told me to “Go To Hell” when I asked her if She wanted to be an involuntary member of the Idaho Militia.
225 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:37:52pm |
re: #220 Political Atheist
Yeah, infrastructure is the key. There’s no particular reason a poor schlub who has to commute 70 miles to work should pay the tax on the gas he uses to do that, and the company that employs him shouldn’t. It’s necessary to both of them that he get there. The infrastructure benefits them to.
Consumption taxes can drive conservation, but only if it’s paired with actual alternatives. If we were raising the gas tax while immensely strengthening public transport, that’d make sense. But it makes as much sense to tax people generally for infrastructure as it does to tax drivers. I don’t drive at all. I order a lot of shit from the internet. I don’t have to pay the taxes on that gas— sure, part of that cost is passed to me, but only part, and I still don’t directly pay it— but it’d make sense if I did.
Most attempts to tie a tax to a particular need gets tricky immediately because things are so interconnected.
226 | Political Atheist Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:40:02pm |
re: #223 klys
Agreed, although that model will also face increased challenges with improvements to MPG and increases in electric cars.
Great point. The electric and hybrid cars will need to be taxed differently. Schizo governance-Give tax incentives to buy hybrid and electric cars. Then tax those cars extra to make up lost gasoline revenue. Go figure.
227 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:42:41pm |
re: #226 Political Atheist
Great point. The electric and hybrid bars will need to be taxed differently. Schizo governance-Give tax incentives to buy hybrid and electric cars. Then tax those cars extra to make up lost gasoline revenue. Go figure.
They’ve been struggling with that here in Oregon and Washington. Electric cars don’t produce enough tax revenue.
228 | Killgore Trout Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:45:48pm |
Good news! Cyborg rat brains connected!
One rat brain ‘talks’ to another using electronic link
Scientists have connected the brains of lab rats, allowing one to communicate directly to another via cables.
The wired brain implants allowed sensory and motor signals to be sent from one rat to another, creating the first ever brain-to-brain interface.
The scientists then tested whether the rat receiving the signal could correctly interpret the information.
As the ultimate test of their system, the team even linked the brains of rats that were thousands of miles apart.
My favorite quote…
“If you want to get information into the brain, then putting electrodes right at the brain sites is the way to do it. However, it’s clearly very invasive,” said Prof James.
He added that the invasive nature of the research raised ethical questions: “It’s very, very interesting isn’t it? Because in humans you’d obviously get informed consent in doing this.”
Prof James explained: “It’s an exciting paper which basically shows that it is possible to take information out of the brain, and it is possible to take information and pump it into the brain.
“What this shows is that the technology is here. And the sort of things we should be talking about is: Why are we doing this, and what do we hope to get out of it?”
230 | Varek Raith Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:48:00pm |
231 | Patricia Kayden Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:48:32pm |
re: #86 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
I hope that the government’s attorneys are making these points in front of the US Supreme Court. It would be nice if the VRA was upheld despite Scalia’s obvious disdain for it.
232 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:50:25pm |
re: #231 Patricia Kayden
To be clear, the only section of the VRA that’s considered seriously under threat is section 5, pre-clearance. I’m pretty sure of that, anyway.
233 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:50:44pm |
NASCAR not amused.
NASCAR Nationwide Series Driver Jeremy Clements Suspended for Using Racial Slur
NASCAR Nationwide Series driver Jeremy Clements reportedly used an unidentified racial slur in an interview with a writer at Daytona International Speedway. That slip-up has cost him dearly, as Clements has been indefinitely suspended from racing.
234 | Interesting Times Thu, Feb 28, 2013 5:52:30pm |
re: #232 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
To be clear, the only section of the VRA that’s considered seriously under threat is section 5, pre-clearance.
235 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:02:05pm |
OOPS!
Thousands of litres of whisky flushed down drain in Dumbarton
Instead of draining away waste water, the workers on duty somehow flushed out thousands of litres of bulk whisky.
237 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:07:31pm |
re: #233 Bubblehead II
I wonder if he said ‘n-rigged’.
238 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:14:15pm |
239 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:15:25pm |
re: #237 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
I wonder if he said ‘n-rigged’.
That seems to the consensus in the comments section. Apparently he was having oil flow problems with his car and they did some quick repairs that didn’t quite work. Either way, it is an ugly phrase that needs to be stamped out.
240 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:16:15pm |
re: #237 Glenn Beck’s Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut
I wonder if he said ‘n-rigged’.
It’s still a stupid phrase. My redneck neighbor used to say that all the time. He was definitely a son of the South.
241 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:21:43pm |
re: #238 thedopefishlives
You rang?
Evening Lizardim.
Was below deck checking the avionics. It appears that the problem has been repaired.
242 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:24:24pm |
re: #241 Gus
Was below deck checking the avionics. It appears that the problem has been repaired.
Helmsman, take us out. Full speed ahead.
243 | klys Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:25:38pm |
re: #242 thedopefishlives
Helmsman, take us out. Full speed ahead.
Don’t forget to take off the parking brake!
245 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:27:34pm |
re: #240 thedopefishlives
It’s still a stupid phrase. My redneck neighbor used to say that all the time. He was definitely a son of the South.
I still hear it. Hell, I even had a coworker tell me it was actually a compliment.
As the in, the air filter Nasa built from assorted parts for Apollo 13 was a N-Rigged device that actually worked and saved the crew.
Bullshit!
It meant then, as well as now, shoddy work, using the wrong parts, by incompetent individuals to get a job done.
247 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:29:24pm |
re: #246 Gus
This right here…
It’s autoscrolling too.
I don’t know. I lurk in thread spy mode, so I don’t see ads all too often.
248 | PhillyPretzel Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:29:28pm |
re: #246 Gus
Ahh. I wondered what that was. Thanks. :)
249 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:30:44pm |
re: #245 Bubblehead II
I still hear it. Hell, I even had a coworker tell me it was actually a compliment.
As the in, the air filter Nasa built from assorted parts for Apollo 13 was a N-Rigged device that actually worked and saved the crew.
Bullshit!
It meant then, as well as now, shoddy work, using the wrong parts, by incompetent individuals to get a job done.
Yeah. Ironically enough, the example you picked is the diametric opposite of the actual meaning of the phrase. Quick and cobbled together, yes, but it was a carefully thought-out solution by some very bright people.
250 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:31:57pm |
re: #246 Gus
This right here…
It’s autoscrolling too.
Don’t think I’ve seen that before. Charles have you been tweaking the system again?
251 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:33:31pm |
re: #250 Bubblehead II
Don’t think I’ve seen that before. Charles have you been tweaking the system again?
It’s like right in the middle of everything. Links to some goofy “TinyBytes for Me” site and another called “Daily Pix Me.”
252 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:38:34pm |
re: #251 Gus
It’s like right in the middle of everything. Links to some goofy “TinyBytes for Me” site and another called “Daily Pix Me.”
This is why I have a subscription. Also: use AdBlock.
253 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:39:35pm |
re: #251 Gus
It’s like right in the middle of everything. Links to some goofy “TinyBytes for Me” site and another called “Daily Pix Me.”
I think Charles is trying to fuck with our heads.
Worlds Hottest Female Politicians. With a Picture of Michelle?
254 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:40:24pm |
WTF DERP
1. Obama should not be praised for fightingDOMA. He should be impeached.— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) March 1, 2013
2. His sacred duty according to the Constitution is to”take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” DOMA is a law.— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) March 1, 2013
3. Refusing to defend a law and instead fighting it in court is not faithfully executing the law but its opposite. QED.— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) March 1, 2013
255 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:41:10pm |
re: #254 Vicious Babushka
WTF DERP
Laws, once enacted, are immutable. Now tell him that about ObamaCare.
256 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:42:13pm |
257 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:45:02pm |
re: #254 Vicious Babushka
WTF DERP
“3. Refusing to defend a law and instead fighting it in court is not faithfully executing the law but its opposite. QED.”
No, shit for brains. If you don’t like a Law, you go to Court, present your case as to why you feel the Law is wrong and then let the court determine if you arguments are valid. You know, Using your right of redress under the Constitution.
Edited for clarity.
259 | AlexRogan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:47:53pm |
re: #118 Gus
Congrats, Erick, Son of Erick…you’ve just had first-hand experience with the nutjobs that you and the rest of the RWNJ media darlings have been pandering to and stirring up.
Have fun with that!
260 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:49:11pm |
re: #257 Bubblehead II
No shit for brains. If you don’t like a Law, you go to Court, present your case as to why you feel the Law is wrong and then let the court determine if you arguments are valid. You know, Using your right of redress under the Constitution.
Not to mention that Obama, as head of the Executive, has the power of selective enforcement. It’s the executive’s check on the legislature when the veto is overridden.
262 | chadu Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:53:29pm |
263 | AlexRogan Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:55:01pm |
264 | Charles Johnson Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:55:47pm |
re: #258 Gus
Sure, I always want to hear opinions. I’m still experimenting with options and settings, though, so it may change.
265 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:58:04pm |
re: #262 chadu
Supporting Israel is a necessity, but Jews are bad. Okay.
(WTFF?!?!)
People like Tony Perkins think all Teh Juice are going to Hell, but they support Israel to fuel a nuclear war in the Middle East and then
Armageddon will happen and Teh Bad Juice will DIE but Teh Good Juice will ACCEPT JESUS WHO WILL THEN COME DOWN FROM TEH HEBBEN AND KILL ALL TEH MUSLIMZ!!!111!!!!
266 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 6:58:14pm |
re: #264 Charles Johnson
Sure, I always want to hear opinions. I’m still experimenting with options and settings, though, so it may change.
Well. Is it always going to link to those sites? It also seems to be right in the middle of things up there. Right next to the “jump to bottom” button. Right now, I’m not liking it. The scrolling is kind of distracting too.
267 | chadu Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:02:29pm |
re: #139 Killgore Trout
Since it seems we’re going over the fiscal cliff tomorrow you’d the there’d be a lot of coverage about what to expect, economic impact, long and sort term consequences, when/how it might be resolved. Almost nothing. Mostly just coverage of the “he said/she said” finger pointing.
Outside the Beltway, no one has an idea or a care (until shit starts happening next week).
Inside the Beltway, we know what the sitch is and who’s responsible: the House GOP.
PROGNOSTICATION: Sequester will be defined for 11:59 pm Friday night, 3/1, and the meeting tomorrow will have Boehner ceding that tax increases/revenue is part of what needs to happen, and Obama agrees to a handful of additional cuts.
That way Boehner looks “tough” (Congress vacation, no meetings on sequester thus far, not blinking until the last second) to his constituents/donors by playing chicken with the economy; Obama gets the juice from a last-minute compromise; and everyone can spin it as they will.
However, if the above is completely wrong… Well, welcome to the death throes of the GOP.
268 | Stanley Sea Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:04:43pm |
re: #265 Vicious Babushka
People like Tony Perkins think all Teh Juice are going to Hell, but they support Israel to fuel a nuclear war in the Middle East and then
the hebbin
ha
269 | Vicious Babushka Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:06:58pm |
OMFG.
Jim Hoft Hugz Pammy. (Click at your own risk, not responsible for what can not be unseen.)
270 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:08:08pm |
re: #260 thedopefishlives
Not to mention that Obama, as head of the Executive, has the power of selective enforcement. It’s the executive’s check on the legislature when the veto is overridden.
Correct. Block and then take to Trial to have said Law overturned by the Courts. Bryan doesn’t seem to understand that concept.
271 | thedopefishlives Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:09:05pm |
re: #270 Bubblehead II
Correct. Block and then take to Trial to have said Law overturned by the Courts. Bryan doesn’t seem to understand that concept.
There are a lot of concepts the Christian Caveman doesn’t seem to understand.
273 | Bubblehead II Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:12:57pm |
re: #269 Vicious Babushka
OMFG.
Jim Hoft Hugz Pammy. (Click at your own risk, not responsible for what can not be unseen.)
Well. he just sealed his fate/doom. That pic was the kiss of death.
274 | chadu Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:14:37pm |
re: #265 Vicious Babushka
People like Tony Perkins think all Teh Juice are going to Hell, but they support Israel to fuel a nuclear war in the Middle East and then
18th Century eschatological interpretations of 5th Century critiques against the Church of Rome don’t impress me.
(NOTE: Dates might be off, because I’ve had a beer or three, and can’t be arsed to Wikipedia actual dates.)
276 | Gus Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:16:31pm |
Of course in Hagel’s case IOKIYAR up until you get chosen for a cabinet position by Democrat.
277 | Mentis Fugit Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:17:00pm |
re: #249 thedopefishlives
Yeah. Ironically enough, the example you picked is the diametric opposite of the actual meaning of the phrase. Quick and cobbled together, yes, but it was a carefully thought-out solution by some very bright people.
My life is not richer for having learned that such a term exists. Indeed, it seems contrivedly offensive.
What was actually done - a skilled improvisation - is more than adequately described by the term “jury rigged”, while a Brit-Eng speaker looking to characterize a shoddy piece of work has recourse to “jerry-built”, an epithet that has the virtue of being a slander against no one. Not even the Germans.
278 | chadu Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:18:02pm |
re: #275 Gus
IOKIYAR
IOKIYAR hypocrisy pisses me off more than anything.
David Vitter visits prostitutes for diaper-play? OK.
Larry Craig uses his “wide-stance” to solicit gax sex in airport bathrooms? OK.
Andrew Weiner sexts a pic of his clothed package? BURN HIM AS A WITCH!!!
279 | Glenn Beck's Grand Unifying Theory of Obdicut Thu, Feb 28, 2013 7:20:44pm |
re: #277 Mentis Fugit
What was actually done - a skilled improvisation - is more than adequately described by the term “jury rigged”, while a Brit-Eng speaker looking to characterize a shoddy piece of work has recourse to “jerry-built”, an epithet that has the virtue of being a slander against no one. Not even the Germans.