ABC finding out about the fine print on the Faustian deal she made to sit on the SCOTUS bench:

‘I’m kind of shocked’: Amy Coney Barrett backs up Sonia Sotomayor in abortion case

“That’s a lot for the doctor to risk,” Sotomayor noted. “When Idaho law changed to make the issue whether she’s going to die or not, or whether she’s going to have a serious medical condition, there’s a big daylight by your standards, correct?”

“It is very case-by-case,” Turner insisted.

“That’s the problem,” Sotomayor pushed back before Barrett weighed in.

“I’m kind of shocked, actually,” the conservative justice reacted, “because I thought your own expert had said below that these kinds of cases were covered, and you’re now saying they’re not?”

“No, I’m not saying that,” Turner responded.

“Well, you’re hedging,” Barrett observed. “I mean, Justice Sotomayor is asking you, would this be covered or not? And it was my understanding that the legislature’s witnesses said that these would be covered.”

“Yeah, and those doctors said if they were exercising their medical judgment, they could, in good faith, determine that life-saving care was necessary,” Turner explained.

“But some doctors — couldn’t doctors might reach a contrary conclusion, I think is what Sotomayor is asking you,” Barrett pointed out.

Judge Lydia finally realizing that all that “exceptions” talk was always bunk, that so long as the power to decide what is “medically necessary” rests with the state and their paid stooges, doctors can’t be sure that saving a woman’s life or fertility won’t lead to a jail term or worse.